8.8 KiB
Strategy
Pattern
GitOps via Gitea Actions runners. The runner is stateless and SSHes into the target host using a short-lived step-ca-issued cert. The job is a thin caller of the shared deploy-stack.yml reusable workflow defined in this repo — see automation.md.
dev box ── git push ──► Gitea (Charlie/<stack>) ── webhook ──► any runner
│
│ ssh sys-gitea-runner@<host>
│ (step-ca cert, 5min)
▼
on the target host:
git fetch && git reset --hard origin/main
sops --decrypt … (if `decrypt:` set)
docker compose pull && docker compose up -d
rm decrypted plaintext
The git working tree at /mnt/nas/stacks/<stack>/ is the deployment. Runtime state lives separately under /mnt/nas/data/<stack>/ (see layout.md).
Rules
- One owner host per stack (singleton stacks). The host named in the workflow's
host:input is where the runner SSHes. - Shared stacks (run on multiple hosts — see Shared stacks) follow the same NFS-shared-tree model but each host runs its own
docker compose up -dagainst host-specific overrides. - No hand-edits on the host once a stack is repo-managed. The deploy workflow does
git fetch && git reset --hard, which clobbers any drift on purpose. - Runtime state never enters git. Compose files bind into
/mnt/nas/data/<stack>/, not into the working tree. .envignored,.env.exampletracked. Plaintext secrets stay out — encrypted form lives undersecrets/.- Image tags pinned. No
:latest. - Any runner can deploy any stack to any host. Routing-by-runner-label is intentionally avoided (Gitea bug; see automation.md → Gitea quirks). The runner SSHes to wherever
host:points.
Repo types
Three. (We dropped upstream+overrides — see Why no upstream cloning.)
init
Stack is currently just a NAS folder. git init in the new /mnt/nas/stacks/<stack>/, push to Charlie/<name>. Recipe: migration.md.
rewrite
Code we author, currently a clone of a github.com repo. Move to /mnt/nas/stacks/<stack>/, git remote set-url origin to Charlie. Recipe: migration.md.
mirror
Pull-mirror of an upstream we don't customise (or want as offline backup). Configured via Gitea's pull-mirror feature. Read-only, never deployed from. Naming: Charlie/<name>-mirror.
Shared stacks
Some stacks run on multiple hosts with the same image but slightly different configuration (e.g. otelcollector, portainer-agent). The pattern, borrowed from Ansible inventories + Kustomize overlays + Kubernetes DaemonSets:
Charlie/<stack>/
├── docker-compose.yml # the "what" — default, used by hosts without an override
├── docker-compose.<host>.yml # full per-host compose (when the delta is structural)
├── envs/
│ ├── morgott.env # per-host env (Ansible host_vars equivalent)
│ ├── melina.env
│ ├── mohg.env
│ └── miquella.env
├── overrides/ # additive overlay deltas (when env can't express it)
│ └── <host>.yml
├── secrets/ # SOPS-encrypted; decrypted at deploy time
│ └── env.sops.yaml # (or per-host: <host>.env.sops.yaml)
├── .sops.yaml # recipients (per secrets.md)
├── .gitea/workflows/deploy.yaml # calls the reusable workflow in this repo
└── README.md
Per-host resolution order
Applied identically by deploy-stack.yml and by the manual fallback recipe:
- If
docker-compose.<host>.ymlexists → use only that (full per-host compose). - Else
docker-compose.yml+ (if present)overrides/<host>.ymllayered on top. - If
envs/<host>.envexists → loaded with--env-filein either case.
Hostname is lowercased (hostname -s | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'). The reusable workflow takes the host from its host: input, which the caller sets explicitly (often via a matrix).
When to use which
| Delta type | Use |
|---|---|
| Different scalar value (port, env var, URL) | envs/<host>.env |
| Add an extra service or scalar field | overrides/<host>.yml (compose merges additively) |
| Replace a list (volumes, command, networks) | docker-compose.<host>.yml (full file) |
| Different image | docker-compose.<host>.yml |
Compose's !override and !reset YAML tags exist for list-replacement, but support is uneven across compose versions (notably broken on Synology DSM's bundled compose). Prefer the full-file approach when replacing lists.
Canonical deploy workflow
Every stack repo carries this in .gitea/workflows/deploy.yaml (no deploy.sh):
name: Deploy
on:
push:
branches: [main]
workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
deploy:
uses: https://sys-gitea-runner:${{ secrets.RUNNER_REPO_PAT }}@gitea.alexandru.macocian.me/Charlie/project-charlie/.gitea/workflows/deploy-stack.yml@main
with:
host: morgott
decrypt: |
secrets/env.sops.yaml -> .env
secrets: inherit
Drop the decrypt: for stacks without secrets. Use a matrix for shared stacks. Full input reference + manual-fallback recipe: automation.md. The token-prefix uses: URL is a Gitea workaround documented in automation.md → Gitea quirks.
Mental model
- "What" =
docker-compose.yml(or per-host file). - "Where" = the host named in the workflow's
host:input. Any runner picks up the job; the runner SSHes into that host and runs everything there. - Per-host vars =
envs/<host>.env. - Per-host structural deltas =
overrides/<host>.ymlfor additive,docker-compose.<host>.ymlfor replacement. - Group defaults = compose env-var defaults (
${VAR:-default}).
Shared-stack workflow shape
For stacks that fan out across hosts, the matrix lives in the caller and the reusable workflow handles per-host file resolution per the rules above:
jobs:
deploy:
strategy:
matrix:
host: [morgott, melina, mohg, miquella]
uses: https://sys-gitea-runner:${{ secrets.RUNNER_REPO_PAT }}@gitea.alexandru.macocian.me/Charlie/project-charlie/.gitea/workflows/deploy-stack.yml@main
with:
host: ${{ matrix.host }}
decrypt: |
secrets/${{ matrix.host }}.env.sops.yaml -> envs/${{ matrix.host }}.env
secrets: inherit
That's a Kubernetes DaemonSet shape adapted to compose + Gitea Actions.
Why no upstream cloning
Previously we considered cloning upstream's source on the host and layering a docker-compose.override.yml. Dropped because:
- For every "upstream image" stack (
invidious,searxng,victoriametrics,mealie,paperless-ngx), we only ever ran the published image. Their source tree is dead weight on the host. - Override-on-template means the upstream's compose can change under us silently.
- Two-remote / rebase / force-push dance was the price for dubious value.
Instead: our docker-compose.yml references the published image directly. It is the only compose. Upstream's compose is a reference document we read in their mirror repo when we want to see what changed.
Image-update flow (Phase 3)
Diun watches registries; on a tag/digest change it POSTs to a Gitea webhook that triggers a redeploy workflow with force-pull: true on the owner host. Replaces watchtower.
Secrets
Decided. SOPS-in-repo with one age key per host. The reusable deploy-stack.yml workflow SSHes into the target host as sys-gitea-runner and runs sops --decrypt there using the host's /etc/charlie/age.key. Plaintext stays on the target host (mode 0600), gets cleaned up by an if: always() step. Full design and rollout plan: secrets.md.
Why not Portainer/Komodo/Dockge
- Portainer Stacks-from-Git: works, but no submodule support, opinionated about working-tree location, adds a control plane on top of git.
- Komodo: nice, also pull-based, also relocates working trees. Reconsider if we ever want a UI.
- Dockge: file mgmt only, no git wiring.
The runner-driven pattern keeps us in plain git + docker compose and adds nothing the team doesn't already understand.